Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Posted on September 7, 2025

By Dr. Kulsoom Baloch

Prioritizing Embryos — PGT vs Morphology

When you have more than one embryo ready for transfer, you must decide which embryo goes first. Two major tools guide this decision:

  • PGT (genetic information): chromosomal normality, mosaicism, translocations, single-gene status
  • Morphology (how the embryo looks): grade of inner cell mass, trophectoderm, expansion stage

Where it fits:

  • You use embryo prioritization after retrieval, not during stimulation.
  • Prioritization affects transfer order, chance of success per transfer, and how many cycles you may need.

What it changes:

  • PGT can dramatically shift the order of embryos, because genetic normality usually predicts the highest success.
  • Morphology adds detail within groups (euploid vs mosaic vs untested).
  • The right strategy reduces failed transfers, miscarriage risks, and time to pregnancy.

Upstream decisions that influence prioritization:

  • Day 5/6 development
  • Lab performance and biopsy technique
  • PGT type (PGT-A, PGT-M, PGT-SR)
  • Patient age and ovarian response (affects proportion of euploids)

Who It Helps

Signals Prioritizing by PGT Is a Good Fit

  • You have multiple embryos and want to maximize success per transfer.
  • You want to reduce miscarriage risk.
  • You’re older than 35 or have a history of recurrent pregnancy loss.
  • You’ve had previous failed transfers without clear cause.
  • PGT results show clear differences (euploid vs mosaic vs aneuploid).

When Morphology Becomes More Important

  • You have untested embryos (no PGT).
  • You have multiple euploid embryos and need tie-breakers.
  • PGT is not affordable or not medically indicated.
  • You prefer a transfer sooner without waiting for PGT turnaround.
  • You have embryos from different cycles or labs with differing visual grades.

When a Mixed Approach Works Best

  • You have a mix of euploid + mosaic embryos.
  • You have euploid embryos with varying morphology.
  • You have embryos where morphology and genetics disagree (e.g., beautiful mosaic vs mediocre euploid).

Step-by-Step

A simple sequence with checkpoints to reduce stress and protect embryo quality:

  1. Sort by Genetic Category

    • First: Euploid

    • Then: Low-level mosaics

    • Then: High-level mosaics (case-dependent)

    • Last: Aneuploid (not transferable except rare exceptions)

  2. Refine Within the Category Using Morphology
    Prioritize based on:

    • Trophectoderm quality (important for implantation)

    • Inner cell mass (future fetus)

    • Blastocyst expansion stage

  3. Cross-Check With Clinical Factors

    • Uterine readiness

    • Previous transfer outcomes

    • Age and medical history

    • Implants-per-transfer strategy (single embryo vs multiple cycles)

  4. Decide Transfer Order + Confirm Plan
    Make a final list, e.g.:

    1. Euploid 5AA

    2. Euploid 5AB

    3. Low-level mosaic 4BB

    4. High-level mosaic 3BC

  5. Review Costs & Timeline Before Scheduling Transfer
    Ensures you avoid surprise billing and understand add-on prenatal testing if mosaics are used.

Pros & Cons

Pros of Prioritizing PGT First

  • Highest live birth rate per transfer
  • Lowest miscarriage rate
  • Prevents unnecessary failed cycles
  • Reduces emotional roller-coasters
  • Minimizes long-term cost by avoiding repeated transfers

Cons of Relying Mainly on PGT

  • Requires biopsy + lab processing (time + cost)
  • Mosaic results can create confusion
  • Small risk of embryo biopsy harm (rare but real)

Pros of Prioritizing Morphology First

  • Works well when PGT is not performed
  • No added biopsy or testing cost
  • Immediate transfer possible

Cons of Relying Only on Morphology

  • “Beautiful” embryos can still be genetically abnormal
  • Higher miscarriage risk
  • May require more transfers and more medication costs

Costs & Logistics

Typical Line Items

  • PGT-A / PGT-M / PGT-SR fees
  • Embryo biopsy
  • Freezing + storage
  • Transfer cycle costs
  • Prenatal testing (if mosaic transfer)

Insurance & Prior Authorization

  • Some plans cover PGT only for medical indications (e.g., translocations).
  • Biopsy often billed separately.
  • Prenatal follow-up costs (NIPT, amnio) vary widely.

Cash-Flow Scenarios

  • Choosing by PGT first may cost more upfront but less overall.
  • Morphology-first may avoid biopsy costs but increases risk of multiple transfers.
  • Ask for written quotes for:
    • PGT

    • Biopsy

    • Freezing

    • Transfer cycle

    • Prenatal testing (if applicable)

Tracking Tips

Use a simple 1-page bill tracker:

  • Test type
  • Clinic charges
  • Lab charges
  • Insurance status
  • Date submitted
  • Date paid

What Improves Outcomes

High-Impact Actions

  • Prioritize euploid embryos first
  • Use clear transfer order categories
  • Optimize uterine lining and hormonal timing
  • Choose a lab with strong biopsy + PGT accuracy
  • Keep stimulation protocols consistent across cycles (reduces variability in morphology)

Low-Impact Actions

  • Embryo photos alone without grades
  • Supplements not prescribed for a medical reason
  • Overemphasizing day-5 vs day-6 embryos when genetics is available
  • Obsessing over tiny morphology differences (AA vs AB rarely changes outcomes significantly)

Case Study

A 34-year-old patient had:

  • 3 euploid embryos
  • 2 mosaics
  • 1 untested embryo from a previous clinic

Initially, she wanted to transfer the “best-looking” 5AA embryo—even though another embryo had the same morphology but slightly better genetic profile.

After applying the prioritization framework:

Final order:

  1. Euploid #2 (stable profile, strong morphology)
  2. Euploid #1
  3. Euploid #3
  4. Mosaic embryo with low-level abnormality
  5. Mosaic high-level
  6. Untested embryo

Outcome:

  • First transfer led to live birth.
  • She retained embryos for a second pregnancy with clear expectations and no additional retrieval.

Mistakes to Avoid

  • Treating morphology as more important than PGT for euploid embryos
  • Ignoring mosaic detail and chromosome type
  • Rushing to transfer before results are fully explained
  • Prioritizing day-5 embryos when day-6 euploids perform similarly
  • Stacking too many factors—keep the order simple
  • Not writing down your transfer sequence ahead of time

FAQs

Q. Is PGT more important than morphology?

Ans : For most people, yes. Genetics predicts success better than appearance.

Q. Can a gorgeous embryo be abnormal?

Ans : Absolutely—morphology alone can be misleading.

Q. Should I always transfer the best-looking euploid first?

Ans : Usually yes, but the genetic result matters more than small grade differences.

Q. What if I have only mosaics?

Ans : You can still prioritize: low-level → specific favorable chromosomes → high-level.

Q. Do day-6 embryos perform worse?

Ans : Not when they are euploid—day-6 euploids have similar live birth rates.

Q. Should untested embryos ever go before mosaics?

Ans : It depends on age, history, and morphology—but generally mosaics go first because they at least carry genetic information.

Next Steps

  • Free 15-min nurse consult
  • Upload your labs
  • Get a personalized cost breakdown for your case

Related Links

Dr. Kulsoom Baloch

Dr. Kulsoom Baloch is a dedicated donor coordinator at Egg Donors, leveraging her extensive background in medicine and public health. She holds an MBBS from Ziauddin University, Pakistan, and an MPH from Hofstra University, New York. With three years of clinical experience at prominent hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan, Dr. Baloch has honed her skills in patient care and medical research.

r