Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors

Tailoring Treatment for a Cancer Diagnosis

Course / Tailoring Treatment for a Cancer Diagnosis

Overview of Treatment Approaches

The objective of ovarian stimulation is to recruit multiple follicles for egg retrieval in a short timeframe, while maintaining safe hormone levels.

Key factors influencing the chosen approach include:

  • Type of cancer and treatment timeline

  • Hormone receptor status (especially in breast, ovarian, or endometrial cancers)

  • Blood clotting or thrombotic risk

  • Baseline ovarian reserve (AMH, antral follicle count)

  • Availability of time before chemotherapy or radiation

Clinicians must often compress treatment cycles from the traditional 4–6 weeks to as few as 10–14 days without compromising egg yield or patient safety.

The Basics on Fertility Drugs & Protocols

Fertility preservation uses controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) to encourage multiple eggs to mature in one cycle. The standard regimen combines:

  • Gonadotropins (FSH and/or LH analogs) – to stimulate follicular growth

  • GnRH agonists or antagonists – to prevent premature ovulation

  • Trigger injections (hCG or GnRH agonist) – to mature eggs for retrieval

Goals of Stimulation

  • Produce 10–20 mature eggs, depending on patient age and ovarian reserve

  • Maintain controlled estradiol levels

  • Allow egg retrieval before cancer therapy starts

Because many cancer patients must begin treatment urgently, protocols are often shortened or initiated at non-traditional cycle times (“random-start stimulation”).

The Long Agonist & Antagonist Protocols

Long Agonist Protocol

This traditional approach uses a GnRH agonist (such as leuprolide acetate) for pituitary suppression before starting gonadotropins.
It provides excellent synchronization and egg yield but requires 2–3 weeks of preparation, which may be unsuitable for urgent oncology cases.

Advantages:

  • Predictable follicular growth

  • Reduced risk of premature LH surge

  • High oocyte yield

Limitations for Cancer Patients:

  • Time-consuming

  • Higher estrogen exposure

  • Often avoided for hormone-sensitive cancers or when treatment urgency is high

Progestin Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS)

PPOS is an increasingly popular alternative that uses oral progestins (e.g., medroxyprogesterone acetate or dydrogesterone) instead of GnRH antagonists to suppress premature ovulation.

Key Advantages:

  • Eliminates need for daily antagonist injections

  • Reduces overall cost and patient discomfort

  • Provides effective ovulation suppression during short or flexible-start protocols

Clinical Application:
PPOS is especially valuable when stimulation must start at any point in the cycle (“random-start”) or when patient tolerance for injections is low.
Since all embryos or oocytes are frozen, the luteal phase effects of progestins are irrelevant to cycle outcome.

Random-Start Protocol & Shortening the Delay to Start Drugs

Cancer treatment timelines are often urgent. Waiting for a menstrual cycle to begin stimulation is rarely feasible.

Random-start ovarian stimulation allows gonadotropins to begin at any point in the cycle — follicular, luteal, or mid-cycle — with comparable egg yield and maturity to conventional starts.

Benefits:

  • Enables fertility preservation within 10–14 days total

  • Reduces delay in initiating cancer therapy

  • Maintains acceptable oocyte quantity and maturity

How It Works:

  1. Baseline ultrasound and hormone assessment

  2. Immediate start of gonadotropins

  3. Add GnRH antagonist or progestin suppression when follicles reach 12–13mm

  4. Trigger and retrieve eggs once mature

This approach has become standard-of-care for urgent oncofertility cases worldwide.

Unmedicated Cycles, Tamoxifen, Letrozole, and FSH Dosing for Estrogen-Sensitive Cancers

In estrogen receptor-positive cancers (e.g., breast or endometrial cancers), limiting estrogen exposure during stimulation is crucial.

Modified Natural or Unmedicated Cycles

  • Minimal or no gonadotropins used

  • One or two natural follicles are retrieved

  • Useful when estrogen exposure must be minimized

  • Lower oocyte yield, but safer for select patients

Tamoxifen and Letrozole Protocols

These selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) and aromatase inhibitors help suppress estrogen levels during stimulation.

  • Letrozole (2.5–5 mg daily) is the most common option.
    It decreases estradiol by inhibiting aromatase, maintaining levels near physiologic baseline.

  • Tamoxifen may be used similarly, though it has partial estrogenic effects.

Combined Protocol (Letrozole + FSH):

  • Allows ovarian stimulation with low estrogen rise

  • Yields similar oocyte numbers as conventional stimulation

  • Considered standard protocol for ER-positive breast cancer patients

Blood Clotting Considerations

Cancer patients—especially those with solid tumors or receiving hormonal stimulation—are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

Risk Factors Include:

  • Elevated estrogen levels

  • Immobility

  • Chemotherapy-related vascular effects

  • Use of estrogenic medications or GnRH agonists

Risk Mitigation Strategies:

  • Use Letrozole-based or Antagonist protocols to minimize estrogen levels

  • Encourage hydration and ambulation

  • Use prophylactic low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk cases

  • Avoid high-dose estrogen medications or long protocols when unnecessary

Every patient’s thrombotic risk is individually assessed before stimulation begins.
At Surrogacy4All, safety is paramount, and protocols are chosen to minimize all systemic risks while preserving optimal fertility outcomes.